🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 503+ reviews
Menβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Maple Suede Weaver by Clarks

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.9 out of 5(503 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$116.7
$194.5
Sale
βœ“ on the house delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Sole material: RubberClosure type: Pull-OnRubber sole

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift delivery
↩️
easy-to-use Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Maple Suede Weaver by Clarks

  • Sole material: Rubber
  • Closure type: Pull-On
  • Rubber sole

This product is exceptional for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2587667

Category: Men > SHOES > Oxfords

Original Price:$194.5 USD

Sale Price:$116.7 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ at no charge shipment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4251 reviews

CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Memphis, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So happy with this
For the price, it feels solid enough and it meets expectations. Packaging was basic.
42 people found this helpful
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Tampa, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
A must-have
Personally, the Maple Suede Weaver by Clarks is functional to use and I’m satisfied.
21 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
premier Maple Suede Weaver by Clarks ever
the Maple Suede Weaver by Clarks fits my needs and I’m satisfied.​
17 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Memphis, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb quality
Honestly, the Maple Suede Weaver by Clarks is practical and it meets expectations.
3 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent Maple Suede Weaver by Clarks!
At first, it is functional to use so it’s acceptable.
35 people found this helpful