๐Ÿšš on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.8/5 from 110+ reviews
Womenโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

LeSportsac Backpack Barbie

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.8 out of 5(110 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$49.61
$82.68
Sale
โœ“ on the house delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

I bought it a few years ago, but I not once used it.

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
uncomplicated Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

LeSportsac Backpack Barbie

I bought it a few years ago, but I under no circumstances used it.​

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Women products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1936302

Category: Women > Women's Handbags > Backpacks

Original Price:$82.68 USD

Sale Price:$49.61 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš fulfillment & Returns

โœ“ at no charge shipment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.8
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 3147 reviews

LN
Lauren Nelson โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Omaha, NE
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Totally worth it​
Personally, the LeSportsac Backpack Barbie performs as expected so Iโ€™m okay with it.
50 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Los Angeles, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Fantastic product
The LeSportsac Backpack Barbie is easy-to-use to use.
29 people found this helpful
CL​
Christopher Lee
7 months ago ยท Houston, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Highly advocate!
After some use, the LeSportsac Backpack Barbie is hassle-complimentary to use so Iโ€™m okay with it.
36 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท San Jose, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Exceptional quality
Using the LeSportsac Backpack Barbie has been trouble-no-cost.
39 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago ยท Detroit, MI
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Outstanding!
To be fair, the LeSportsac Backpack Barbie is user-friendly to use which is good enough. Works fine so far.
2 people found this helpful